Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Rawhiiiiide!

After the first mentor meeting and looking at artist Gregory Gillespie, I committed myself to working from life more and building the surface of my paintings more by layering the acrylic using spit-shading.  For convenience I grabbed my son as model. Obviously because he is easy access, but also because I wasn't embarrassed to stare at his cheek up close for awhile. He, on the other hand, thought this was annoyingly weird.



Vincent

I also painted a background, using a geometric composition. I enjoy juxtaposing the patterns of his clothes with that of the geometric background. As well as the patterns on the pillows. Then the representation of tattoo flash to the right of subject.  I like the idea that tattooed people are 'patterned skin'. 

This presented an epiphanic moment to me. A visual theme I want to include and consider will be patterns. How visual patterns direct/affect the viewer.


Along with experimenting with the visual effects of spit-shaded liquid acrylic, I've been trying to tie in the actual process of tattoo in my work.

I've considered painting on other materials as well as unconventional material such as the porcine casings. Although I have gotten some satisfying effects of drying porcine on paper, to actually spit-shade on it did not produce the desired smoothness that the technique enables on paper. Spit-shading is very specific to its materials, from the paper to the brushes to the liquid acrylics used. It takes awhile to' work in' a brush. And I then primarily stick to four main brushes, until the absolute need to replace, which is met with grief. Maybe its how the spit break-in the brush, maybe its my OCD, either way its specifics such as this that define my process. Interestingly this is also true to some tattooer (myself included). The way in which I would prepare my tools etc for a tattoo was very specific,  ritualistic. This ritual was essential.

So I am continuing on the same watercolor paper, as well as figuring out how I want to interpret tattoo. While on a search for actual parchment I was directed to a leather shop. Considering the option of possibly painting leather, I also was introduced to large rawhide sheets. When soaked the rawhide becomes malleable. I bought some leather and rawhide.

Conceptually working in these materials is great, being that they are both skins of animals. I asked the very friendly leather salesman in he ever heard of tattooed rawhide, to which he said if he could figure out how to do it he would make a bunch o money. he said unfortunately the rawhide will 'blow out the ink and not hold the line'.......  malleable


Dry rawhide


After soaking the rawhide, it is in fact maleable. After different attempts and changing needles and messing with the tattoo machine as well as doctoring the ink a bit, I was able to tattoo a design on a piece of rawhide. There are similarities with tattooing skin and rawhide, but the guy was right, its hard to make a clean line without it blowing out. But it is possible, as I figured out. Even with imperfect line there is mark making happening, and this with suffice in how I will represent tattoo in my work. I am pleased that the actual process of tattoo is still used...the way in which i present the two visual pieces together will be through collage. 

What I tattoo and how the tattooed rawhide I use in the painting will work on different levels, both visually and conceptually.



Tattooed rawhide segment




The picture above shows the successful segment of tattooed rawhide. I experimented with forming the piece into an arm-like shape, and then letting that dry and harden. There is possibility of trying 3-D pieces with this possibly in future.  
The lines and shading are imperfect, as rawhide differs from living skin. I actually like this idea as well. Nevertheless, as stated before, there is mark making. Even if some lines spread into the veins of the rawhide, I like the possibilities with that as well. 


Self-portrait

The above is the first attempt of incorporating everything I've been working on thus far.  The bodice thing is the tattooed rawhide, of which a tessellation pattern was tattooed. The rawhide then dried and adhered to the painting, which was done on watercolor paper, which was cut out and adhered to a photograph , which is adhered to a pre-fab board. The rawhide also adds physical dimension, as it is about a centimeter thick. This allows for pieces to be cut out, like the center circle with a traditional tattooed rose inside it.  With this centimeter thick boarder around the rose I was able to fill that with resin. The outcome makes rose look more ornamental,  an aspect of the painting that is given a kind of 'sacred housing'.

I intend to do more along these lines. Pushing my technique both of spit-shading and tattooing rawhide. Hopefully joining them in compositionally interesting collages.


Sunday, September 6, 2015

Update, and the first mentor meeting...

 After the post-residency brain scramble and strange experimentation I embarked on thereafter I had returned a bit more to painting, although subject matter was beginning to transform. Maybe in my experiments with the innards of pigs, I'm not sure, but I began to enjoy making these kind of '2D taxidermy' people-animal beings. Initially I was going to paint on paper, then adhere to pre-fab board and after applying few coats of medium, then wrap the board, and painting with the pig casing.


Nope

So this was the first painting I was planning on wrapping in casing. It was a total fail,as well as it didn't incorporate human parts, although i was thinking of adding a hand. Regardless I wasn't happy so I ditched it. I do however like the hair.




This I was happier with. The awkward synthesis of human/tiger was intentional, although I'm not sure it looks that way. New discoveries were made as far as the possibilities of spit-shading. worked more into it and I'm happy with the result, especially the hair on the tiger part.

This I attempted to wrap in casing. After coating it 3 times with matte medium, I began to lay the casing as I had on the previous boxes.


******* Since I had realized while making previous boxes of the salmonella threat, I also used casings that were pre-soaked in bleach and anti-bacterial soap.*********

After laying a few over the painting.....the paint started to separate and bleed. At this point I liked this painting, so I pulled casings off and was able to save it.  I may need to soak the bleach more out of the casing, and put more coats of finish on the painting, however I took a break from it at this point: FAIL, more or less.

I decided to paint a more involved composition of taxiderm-ied people, so I started this:




After the ddddrrrrraaaawwwwwiiiinnnngggg exhibit I saw in Raleigh At the Contemporary Art Museum and looking at works of Amy Cutler and Marcel Dzama, as well as others in Vitamin D: New Perspectives in Drawing, I began to think I was possibly akin to drawing more than painting, as I presented in my 'Residence Summary', as well as the reasons why.  I thought that is where spit-shading could situate, especially since like drawing, spit-shading is a pre-production technique, leading to tattoo.
I went to the first mentor meeting with Gary Bolding with this in mind. I felt I had a little more direction than where my brain was right after residency, but still something felt a bit unresolved.
One of the reasons I wanted a mentorship with Gary was because of his masterful technique as a figurative oil painter as well as the sometimes odd subjects he paints.

The meeting was completely helpful. I went away from it with a more tangible plan of what I need to work on for the first semester (the nit and grit of the work). We discussed the investigation of skin and obsessiveness the artist has with it and how that can relate conceptually to tattooing.  He pointed out my technical shortcomings even considering the fantastical absurdity of some figures. He mentioned early works of Lucien Freud and more-so the work of Gregory Gillespie.  As well as his contemporary William Beckman.

 Of the pieces I had brought to the residency, he concentrated on one I had completely hated post residency. 


When I showed this at residency it had had a sheet of frosted plexiglass suspended over it which obscured the painting.  When I showed it to Gary, it was like this, no plexiglass.  He pointed out the successes with skin texture, as well as failures of anatomy (eyes, nose). 

Gary also confirmed I was a painter, that what I was doing with spit-shading qualified. This was important to hear as I had considered the possibility I was more making marks closer to what artists in drawing movements are doing.  This redirected my association to my work, which was reiterated after looking at Gregory Gillespie's work. Maybe spit-shading is neither, both ....I'm not sure it matters to label it, but as I develop the technique more it helps to understand it in a way that will help direct how I work. 

Gregory Gillespie:

Self-Portrait On Bed
1973-1974
Oil and Magna on Wood

Self-Portrait with Beads and Charkras
1987-1988
Oil and Alkyd on Panel

Self-Portrait (Torso)
1975
Oil and Acrylic on Wood Panel

Self-Portrait with Banana
2000
Oil on Wood over Photograph





We also discussed my lack of composition in a lot of my painting. He suggested looking at Philip Pearlstein, as well as Degas, Vermeer.